Servant Leadership Communication is Excellence with Compassion

I got my first regular job at 16 years of age, assisting a 45-ish man who ran a family-owned pharmacy in Chicago. Jerry was the pharmacist and manager. He was also a friend to locals who came in to buy newspapers, talk politics, and share jokes.

In addition to cleaning and restocking shelves, I washed pharmaceutical pill bottles and removed the manufacturers’ labels so Jerry could reuse them to fill prescriptions. I spent Saturday mornings soaking bottles and scraping off labels.

After months of Saturdays I asked Jerry why he didn’t just buy new bottles. He suggested that my work served him, the business, customers, and society. Why load up landfills with more glass (there was no recycling)? He added that all human work impacts others.

The importance of what we did, Jerry explained, included the greater meaning of the work, not merely the skill involved, however seemingly menial. He said that much of his pharmacy work was pretty routine. In the bigger picture, though, he was actually keeping people healthy, and I was helping him help them.

I believe that we humans are called to be stewards or, as Robert K. Greenleaf put it, trustees. We are all called to be caretakers of the world we’ve inherited. We don’t ultimately “own” the world even though we do acquire parts of it to use and enjoy. To put it differently, we’re all entrepreneurs who serve others by creating additional worth out of the value that was here long before we were even born.

Moreover, we conduct our caretaking in and through communication. Jerry’s store depended on in-person, written, and telephone communication to serve customers, staff, and the broader community.

Caretaking has two aspects. The first is caring for others. This caring is excellence in action. We become skilled at whatever specifically we’re called to do, including communication. We listen well, speak carefully, write clearly, and persuade effectively as needed to serve others.

The second aspect of caretaking is caring about others—engaging our heart in our work, with compassion. A true professional needs to care about those she is serving.

Jerry was not just called to be a pharmacist. He cared for and about his customers and employees.

Note: This essay is excerpted from my book Communicate Like a True Leader: 30 Days of Life-Changing Wisdom, available from Amazon.

Every leader as caretaker-trustee must be a skilled and caring communicator. These two aspects of caretaking—excellence and compassion—are twin anchors for servant leadership. We learn through communication what they are and how to practice them.

At the time I was too new to the world of work to recognize how fortunate I was to learn caretaking from a true leader like Jerry. Twenty years after he closed the Chicago store and moved to California, I visited him there to thank him personally for caring for and about me. Thanks to Jerry, I became wiser, freer, healthier, and a more autonomous communicator.

Reflection
Do you have a deep sense of your calling as a caretaker? Do you need more skill (excellence) or heart (compassion)—or both? [See my related servant leadership communication video, below.]

Please subscribe to my email list for free excerpts from my
current and forthcoming books. Thanks.

[print_link

Gratitude: The Most Important Servant Leadership Communication Trait

Some years ago I met with former Herman Miller CEO Max DePree to discuss communication. I humbly wanted to confer about his splendid definition of leadership in The Art of Leadership:

“The first responsibility of a leader is to define reality. The last is to say thank you. In between the two, the leader must become a servant and a debtor.”

I had concluded personally that DePree’s definition should begin with the right attitude: gratitude. Real leaders are grateful ones. They are a joy to follow. And they are more effective. So I asked DePree if he thought that maybe the attitude of gratitude should come before “defining reality” in his definition of leadership. I suggested that the amended definition of leadership begin something like this: “The first responsibility of a leader is to accept gratefully the call to serve others.” He quickly agreed. I was relieved. And grateful.

Note: This essay is excerpted from my book Communicate Like a True Leader: 30 Days of Life-Changing Wisdom, available from Amazon.

Why is such preliminary thankfulness important? Why not include gratitude just in the last part of DePree’s definition? Because gratitude gets to the basic demeanor of a servant-minded communicator. Being grateful is a heartfelt way of living and growing. It’s the soil from which the best communication grows. What should a leader give thanks for? Certainly for the opportunity to serve others. For a place and time and people to lead.

A leader should also be thankful for the gift of communication itself. We couldn’t lead or follow without it. We can give thanks for the many people who contributed to our own abilities to communicate. Consider the roles of grandparents and parents, siblings, teachers, colleagues, neighbors, book authors, and so on. To borrow from DePree, our debts are deep.

Finally, consider what the gift of communication has meant for our relationships. Because we can communicate (same root word as “commune”) with one another, we are not relegated to loneliness. We can play and work with others. We can share jokes and joys, trials and tragedies, hopes and dreams. We can encourage and forgive, plan and practice everything from weddings to strategy meetings. We can define leadership with others and then seek together to live out our definition in service of others. And we can revise the definition as we go along.

Communication is a spectacular gift that we inherit from generation to generation and from organization to organization—even from conversation to conversation. To be the kind of leader whose heart is bathed in gratitude is to accept the most fitting beginning for a daily life of service—giving thanks. We know this deep in our hearts. This is why we all seek, even unconsciously, to be around thankful persons. We sense they are grateful for good things, including us. We want to be like them.

So a servant leader communicates with a sense of what Robert K. Greenleaf, the founder of Servant Leadership, calls “awe and wonder.” The leader’s communication begins and ends with heart-opening gratitude. In fact, I believe that gratitude is the missing first chapter in books about leadership and communication [see my related video on servant leadership communication and gratitude, below].

Reflection
Does your communication reflect a grateful heart? Write down the names of two persons who passed along to you the gift of communication. Keep adding to the list as you review your notes in this book. Let your gratitude grow.

Please subscribe to my email list for free excerpts from my
current and forthcoming books. Thanks.

[print_link]

Is Facebook Replacing Front Porches?

Are social media like Facebook the new front porches?

When I grew up in Chicago, neighbors hung out on front porches to wave to passersby and engage in civil conversation. There were almost no rear decks, only makeshift patios. Backyards were for the more private events or kids playing, running from yard to yard.

In the suburbs, mostly unused rear decks have replaced the more neighborly front porches. Ironically, they do not seem to be used all that much.

A study shows that the two areas in the U.S. where the highest numbers of new homes come with decks are the Upper Midwest (46%) and New England (63%), even though they have the shortest seasons for usage.

Perhaps a rear deck is now largely a symbol of leisurely connection with others.

In any case, decks can’t compete with front porches in urban areas. Such porches are one of the greatest communications media (technologies?) ever devised.

A social medium like Facebook is designed for the cyber-suburbs. It’s the new place for gathering, gossiping, and goofing around. It’s become a natural way to find out about friends, relatives, and peers—sometimes even real, proximate neighbors (although Nextdoor seems to be capturing that role; I launched my neighborhood on it).

Used well, Facebook equips us to know what to care about and whom to care for. Perhaps a good rule for posting on Facebook is not to include anything that you wouldn’t say to neighbors on the front porch.

Let’s be neighborly, one medium or the other.

— Dr. Q

We Need Listening Today for Hospitality in Our Hearts

When we truly listen to others, we provide places in our hearts for them.

In the ancient Middle East, where the practice of hospitality apparently began, the basic idea was that each household (or family) should be open to strange (different, or alien) travelers who needed food and a lodging. Jesus captured the significance of ancient hospitality when he said that no one should turn down a stranger because that stranger might be God.

Pubs (public restaurants, often with limited lodging) eventually replaced much household hospitality. Today, common-meal B&Bs are the remnant, or maybe reawakening, of such ancient hospitality.

Ancient hospitality served a friendship-forming, cross-cultural function for promoting peace (what the ancient Hebrews called “shalom”).

By listening to each other’s stories, hosts and guests gained greater understanding of and less fear about one another’s differences. Especially as the children from both families played joyfully amidst the parents, humankind seemed as one,

Today, where such hospitality is largely replaced by the more private hospitality industry, the art of cross-cultural listening is essential. Mutual listening is what we need to begin to empathize and sympathize with those who are both different from us and part of the same humanity.

Listening gets us outside of ourselves and into relationships. When we don’t listen to one another across our differences, we become like ships passing on foggy nights, barely able to see the names on our hulls, let alone to hear one another’s mayday calls.

— Dr. Q

Why Professors Treated Me Like a Lab Rat—Or Why Communication Theories are Dangerous

I taught communication theory at universities for decades. I learned that some theories lead us to communicate inhumanely.

Looking back on my days as a university research assistant, I recall how profs treated me like a lab rat in order to get me to treat freshman subjects like lab rats.

Professors dispensed pellets to us assistants in the form of tuition reimbursements and student wages. They knew how to get me to to do things that I considered questionable, particularly how I treated naive freshmen who were required to participate in experiments.

I learned how to lie and intimidate with a smile. All I had to do was tell the fearful students that their academic careers were at stake. If they did not participate “willingly” and “honestly,” I said, I would not give them the necessary academic credit. I fed them verbal and nonverbal pellets to achieve compliance.

One of the scarier profs who advocated such “behavioral” theory always wore dark sunglasses, making it difficult to gauge his emotions.

I was alone in an elevator when Dr. Sunglasses got on. He stood right in front of me, face to face, with no evident emotion and without speaking for the entire ride. I wondered if he was conducting a behavioral experiment on me.

Yet today, some communication theories are designed to help people effectively manipulate others. Their advocates aim to conform society to their vision of a good society, which is actually closer to 1984.

We professors develop theories that help people influence others. But do we think about the fact that the same theories can be used to influence us? Are we also lab rats?

I think that we all need to evaluate our own, implicit theories of communication. Are we seeking to create virtuous communicators and promote democratic discourse? Or are we manipulating and even oppressing people?

The data-driven communication theories behind contemporary politics might be powerful, but are they serving democratic society? Or are we voters becoming pellet-eating lab rats?

— Dr. Q

Transmission Isn’t Communication

Sending messages is not the same as communication. Communication requires shared understanding.

We live in a storm of mediated messages. Most supposed communication is just noise. Like ads that few people pay attention to.

Bruce Springsteen once sung about “57 Channels (And Nothin’ On).” Little did he know how many channels there would be in the age of social networking.

We all fire off messages. Is anyone really listening? Is there much real communication? Shared understanding?

The power to transmit messages creates the illusion of true communication.

— Q